Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a little bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having an 87.1 score against 80.4. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Lite is much newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with way more MP.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.