Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite's 87.1 general score. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11. Galaxy S20 is an older phone than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a greater pixel number per display inch. The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with higher video frame rate and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.