Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, with a score of 90.8 against 87.1. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy S20 FE body is older, a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and higher 120 frames per second video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.