Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, having a global score of 98 against 87.1. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a better number of pixels per display inch and a quite larger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture for better low light images and video. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance is just as good as Motorola Edge 20 Lite's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.