Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite's 87.1 general score. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's design is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy S21 FE has just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels amount per inch in the display. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.