Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite's global score of 87.1. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version, providing you a couple additional features and performance improvements. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better phone than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, we must highlight that it's also just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a better count of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a battery duration that's just as good as Motorola Edge 20 Lite's battery performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.