Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's body weights the same than Galaxy S7 Active, but it is thinner. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores (but slower). Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.