Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little higher screen pixels density. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.