Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, with a global score of 88.5 against 87.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11 version, giving some additional features. Galaxy Z Flip's design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it was released about a year before.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a much more MP back camera and better 120 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.