Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite's 87.1 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is thinner than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, but it's a lot heavier and was released about 11 months before. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little faster processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels and faster 120 frames per second video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.