Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 20 Lite's 87.1 global score. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is notably heavier but a lot thinner than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola Edge 20 Lite count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a quite lower pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208px resolution. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.