Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is better than Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. These phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro construction is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3a's, but it is also heavier.
Google Pixel 3a features a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Edge 20 Pro one, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.