Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than Google Pixel 4a's overall score of 82.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body is newer and just a little thinner, but incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 4a.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a has a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater display pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.