Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than HTC One M9's 77.7 general score. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is much newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has newer 12 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it counts with a lot of extra features and improved performance.
HTC One M9 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. HTC One M9 features just a bit better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a GPU.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way better resolution back camera. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.