Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a heavier phone than the HTC U Ultra, but both are equally thin. HTC U Ultra features a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM. The HTC U Ultra counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.