Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a 92.8 score against 82.5. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro is extremely newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the previous 12 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better display density. LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little faster processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot better video definition.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.