Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's global score of 81.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the newer 12 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving a couple additional features and optimized performance. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body is much newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it is just a little thicker and heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little better performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ features more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.