Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an older 12 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit greater display density. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both have 12 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Nubia Red Magic 3S and Motorola Edge 20 Pro both have very similar storage capacity for games and applications, they have the same internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with better 24 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.