Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is way better than Galaxy A5 (2017), with a general score of 92.8 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Galaxy A5 (2017), but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a camera in the back with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.