Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A50's 83.8 global score. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy A50's, although it's heavier and a little thicker. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.