Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A51, having a 92.8 score against 85.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the newer 12 version and Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A51, but it's a bit heavier.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot higher resolution back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.