Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, with a general score of 92.8 against 90.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro body is newer and a little bit thinner, but a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger display. Galaxy A51 5G has a bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery performance in Motorola Edge 20 Pro.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.