Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A52's global score of 90.7. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro and the Galaxy A52 were released with only a couple months difference, Motorola Edge 20 Pro's construction is just a bit heavier but a little thinner.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a little larger display.
The Galaxy A52 features a better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 and Motorola Edge 20 Pro both feature similar battery durations.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 108 MP resolution and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.