Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G, with a global score of 92.8 against 91.3. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro and the Galaxy A52 5G were only released with a couple of months difference, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is just a bit heavier but also just a little bit thinner. These devices come with the same Android 12 OS.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit lower screen pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen. Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G features a battery life that is very similar to Motorola Edge 20 Pro's battery life. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.