Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is way better than Galaxy A70, with a 92.8 score against 76.9. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, a greater count of pixels per display inch and a display of the same size.
Galaxy A70 features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy A70 features a battery performance that is very similar to the battery life in Motorola Edge 20 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.