Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 (2018), having a general score of 92.8 against 85.2. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro body has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 (2018), but it is a bit heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking images in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.