Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy M51, having a 92.8 score against 87.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version and Galaxy M51 has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than Galaxy M51.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy M51 has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M51, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a superior battery life than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.