Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 20 Pro's 92.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier than Motorola Edge 20 Pro. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a higher pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the same video frame rate and a 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra have similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.