Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel quantity in each screen inch.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a way better resolution camera and a much higher video resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.