Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a general score of 92.8 against 80.4. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro construction has the same thickness than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.