Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's general score of 79.5. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it's heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.