Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Pro, with a global score of 98 against 92.8. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 20 Pro, we must note that it's also older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have the same 24 frames per second video frame rate, the same video definition and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.