Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, having a 93.4 score against 92.8. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12 version. The Galaxy S22 construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S22, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.