Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-19 | -- |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, getting a overall score of 92.8 against 90.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 12 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, higher 30 fps video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Motorola Edge 20 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.