Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is much better than Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's somewhat heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has older 12 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a camera in the back with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.