Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-19 | -- |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 general score. These devices work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better count of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit processor.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.