Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 general score. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro is newer than the Galaxy Z Flip, it's a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 12 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little greater pixel number per inch of display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Motorola Edge 20 Pro one, both have the same 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.