Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is much better than the HTC One M9, having an 86.1 score against 77.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 has the newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Although the Motorola Edge 20 is just a little heavier than HTC One M9, it's much thinner and extremely newer.
HTC One M9 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels in each inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 20 counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and a graphics processor. The Motorola Edge 20 takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The Motorola Edge 20 features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.