Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 has a score of 86.1, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Motorola Edge 20's construction is a lot newer, just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 counts with a bit superior processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM. Motorola Edge 20 has a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
HTC U Ultra features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 features greater battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.