Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a general score of 86.1 against 82.5. The Motorola Edge 20 is a a lot newer and just a little thinner device than LG V30S ThinQ, although it is also just a little bit heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 has an older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ's processor is just as good as the processor in Motorola Edge 20, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 counts with superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 20 takes greater pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.