Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 86.1 score against 81.3. Motorola Edge 20 is a a lot newer and just a bit thinner phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it is also a bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge 20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Motorola Edge 20 has a greater camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 has superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.