Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 has a global score of 86.1, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Motorola Edge 20 is a newer phone, and it's also incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Edge 20 and nubia Red Magic 3S have quite similar displays, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, they both have a same size display. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 20 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with higher video frame rate and a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.