Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 has a score of 86.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s overall score of 75.8. Motorola Edge 20's design is a lot newer and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it's just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a display that is just as good as Motorola Edge 20's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels count in each inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 20 also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 20 features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.