Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 20's overall score of 86.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 20 has Android 11, so it gives some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 20, although it's way heavier and was released about a year before.
The Motorola Edge 20 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold has a bit better CPU than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rates and a much tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Fold features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.