Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 20, with a 98.9 score against 86.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge 20, we must tell that it's also an older, extremely heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 has Android 11, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster CPU than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a 108 MP back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light images. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.