Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 86.1 score against 80.4. The Motorola Edge 20 construction is much newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Motorola Edge 20 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 20 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.