Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than Motorola Edge 20's 86.1 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Edge 20.
The Motorola Edge 20 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a higher display density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra and Motorola Edge 20 both have extremely similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have the same internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.