Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 86.1 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 20 construction is notably newer, somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Motorola Edge 20 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S7 Active and Motorola Edge 20 both count with really similar batteries. Motorola Edge 20 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.