Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 86.1 score against 81. Motorola Edge 20 is a newer cellphone, and it is also extremely thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that's very similar to the display in Motorola Edge 20, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 20 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Motorola Edge 20 features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.