Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 20, with an 88.5 score against 86.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Motorola Edge 20 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a heavier phone than Motorola Edge 20, but both are 0.28inches thick.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Flip has much more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Edge 20. They have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 20 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.